Comments on: SC House Judiciary Subcommittee http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/ Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:35:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Katie Macmillan http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-228 Katie Macmillan Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:06:41 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-228 I love hearing inspirational stories like these. It shouldn't have been an issue that was even thought about, but at least we stopped it. I love hearing inspirational stories like these. It shouldn’t have been an issue that was even thought about, but at least we stopped it.

]]> By: Sarah Gareau http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-149 Sarah Gareau Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:57:21 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-149 Great work everyone!! Great work everyone!!

]]> By: Kathy Cantrell http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-137 Kathy Cantrell Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:40:08 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-137 Wonderful! Congratulations! Wonderful! Congratulations!

]]> By: Emma Davidson http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-127 Emma Davidson Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:07:01 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-127 Debbie- I couldn't have said it better myself! The scary part about this is that they know where to put their efforts- and they're focusing on the Two Trip Requirement Bill and Born Alive. We have to be ready for these bills! Debbie- I couldn’t have said it better myself! The scary part about this is that they know where to put their efforts- and they’re focusing on the Two Trip Requirement Bill and Born Alive. We have to be ready for these bills!

]]> By: Deborah Billings http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Deborah Billings Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:56:26 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-126 We can all breathe a very momentary sigh of relief as this Act was shelved. Kudos to all who contributed to its demise. What continues to be of concern is the success of the "incremental approach" at chipping away, piece by piece, at what constitutes access to safe abortion care for all women, including adolescents. The approach has been used methodically, strategically and often done fairly "quietly" such that it doesn't cause the public outcry that extremist proposals, such as the Right to Life Act, provoke. That makes all of us need to be ever vigilant about upcoming proposals. Thanks to <em>Tell Them</em> for helping us with doing just that. We can all breathe a very momentary sigh of relief as this Act was shelved. Kudos to all who contributed to its demise. What continues to be of concern is the success of the “incremental approach” at chipping away, piece by piece, at what constitutes access to safe abortion care for all women, including adolescents. The approach has been used methodically, strategically and often done fairly “quietly” such that it doesn’t cause the public outcry that extremist proposals, such as the Right to Life Act, provoke. That makes all of us need to be ever vigilant about upcoming proposals. Thanks to Tell Them for helping us with doing just that.

]]> By: Katie Haswell http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Katie Haswell Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:39:37 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-121 My favorite part is "it is not time for this bill" Amen! Even though the bill died we all have so much work to do! But it is nice to know that the petty-ness of the SC Government allowed them to get nothing done yesterday but to kill a bill. Congrats! My favorite part is “it is not time for this bill” Amen! Even though the bill died we all have so much work to do! But it is nice to know that the petty-ness of the SC Government allowed them to get nothing done yesterday but to kill a bill. Congrats!

]]> By: Kim http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Kim Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:06:56 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-119 Wow! Good job to all those ladies that were there today! Wow! Good job to all those ladies that were there today!

]]> By: Tessa http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Tessa Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:43:55 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-118 Yay! Was so good to see it in person.... and to see it die!!...... good video :) good work! Yay! Was so good to see it in person…. and to see it die!!…… good video :) good work!

]]> By: Kyle http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-117 Kyle Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:53:01 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-117 Pretty incredible, this theocracy we live in! Great job, everyone! We outnumbered the supporters at least 2-1. Good video; wish we could have a video of Rep. Barfield's sermon... Happy to see this bill die; hopefully we will never see the other two reach the floor either. Pretty incredible, this theocracy we live in! Great job, everyone! We outnumbered the supporters at least 2-1. Good video; wish we could have a video of Rep. Barfield’s sermon…

Happy to see this bill die; hopefully we will never see the other two reach the floor either.

]]> By: Emma Davidson http://blog.tellthemsc.org/2010/02/sc-house-judiciary-subcommittee/comment-page-1/#comment-116 Emma Davidson Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:32:47 +0000 http://blog.tellthemsc.org/?p=183#comment-116 I think my favorite part is when the speaker is talking about how he does NOT believe that the Supreme Court's laws are the law of the land, that God's laws are above man's laws, and then turns around and give a Constitutional argument for his position. You can't discredit the source and then quote from it! I think my favorite part is when the speaker is talking about how he does NOT believe that the Supreme Court’s laws are the law of the land, that God’s laws are above man’s laws, and then turns around and give a Constitutional argument for his position. You can’t discredit the source and then quote from it!

]]>